CECIL A. MOORE, APPELLANT,
v.
HUGH F. PURVIS ET AL., APPELLEES
Appellant seeks reversal of a final judgment dismissing his amended complaint. The complaint was in three counts. Counts one and two urged a breach of contract and negligent performance of contract, respectively. The order of dismissal must be affirmed as to these counts upon the rule stated in Sickler v. Indian River Abstract & Guaranty Co., 142 Fla. 528, 195 So. 195 (1940). Appellant’s count three charges fraud, but no facts to support fraud were alleged. See Rule 1.9(b), Fla.R.Civ.P., 30 F.S.A. The allegations were entirely by the conclusion of the pleader.
Appellant’s second point, which urges that he should have been allowed to file another amended complaint, is without merit. See Matson v. Tip Top Grocery Co., 151 Fla. 247, 9 So.2d 366, 368 (1942).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Certified Invs., Inc. v. Dadeland Nat'l Bank, 378 So. 2d 1299 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See, Fleming v. Otis Elevator, 107 Fla. 557, 145 So. 201 (1933); Buckley Tower Condominium, Inc. v. Buchwald, 340 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), cert. den. 348 So. 2d 945 (Fla.1977); Moore v. Purvis, 194 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967); Scocozzo v. General Development, 191 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966).…
Authorities Cited
- Matson v. TIP TOP Grocery Co., Inc., 151 Fla. 247 (Fla. 1942)
- Sickler v. Indian River Abstract & Guar. Co., 142 Fla. 528 (Fla. 1940)
- In re Application of Marion E. Sibley to Resign from the Bar of the State of Fla., 151 Fla. 225 (Fla. 1942)