PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
396 U.S. 555
Supreme Court of the United States (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (U.S. 1970)…ect to the judgments of the New York and Connecticut District Courts relating to the Second and Fourth Supplemental Reports. At the same time we affirmed the judgment of the three-judge court in No. 919, Providence & Worcester Co. v. United States, 396 U. S. 555, and denied certiorari in No. 918, Providence & Worcester Co. v. Smith, 396 U. S. 1062. In these cases, companions to the main litigation, the Providence & Worcester Company sought plenary review of the District Courts’ orders insofar as they had s…
-
State Bd. of Election Comm'rs v. Evers, 405 U.S. 1001 (U.S. 1972)…8), and United Public Workers v. Mitchell, 330 U. S. 75, 84-86 (1947), with Pittsburgh Towing Co. v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co., 385 U. S. 32 (1966); Landry v. Boyle, 393 U. S. 220 (1968); Shapiro v. Doe, 396 U. S. 488 (1970); Stein v. Luken, 396 U. S. 555 (1970); and United States v. Cotton, 397 U. S. 45 (1970). Because I do not wish this disposition of the case to provide a basis for any inference that I, as one member of this Court, am in agreement with the reasoning set forth in the per curiam op…1 / 2