HOUSE OF SEAGRAM, INC.
v.
STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY ET AL.

U.S. | 1969-12-08
No. 563
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
396 U.S. 121 Supreme Court of the United States (1969) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Cragar Indus., Inc., 706 F.2d 503 (5th Cir. 1983)
    …the transfer as the law of the case and should not re-transfer ‘except under the most impelling and unusual circumstances’ or if the transfer order is ‘manifestly erroneous.’ ” United States v. Koenig, 290 F. 2d 166, 173 n. 11 (5th Cir.1961), aff'd, 396 U.S. 121, 90 S.Ct. 396, 24 L.Ed.2d 305 (1962). Failure to abide the original transfer order contains the additional potential mischief of tossing cases back and forth to the detriment of an adjudication of the underlying merits of the case and respect due si…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw