LAWRENCE ET AL.
v.
CITY OF CHICAGO
LAWRENCE ET AL.
CITY OF CHICAGO
396 U.S. 39
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Richard Lawrence v. Woods, 432 F.2d 1072 (7th Cir. 1970)…the ordinance. Thereafter, petitioner sought an appeal in the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court dismissed the appeal and, treating the jurisdictional statement as a petition for writ of certiorari, denied certiorari. Lawrence v. Chicago, 396 U.S. 39, 90 S.Ct. 263, 24 L.Ed.2d 208 (1969). The case was remanded to the circuit court, and petitioner, having refused to pay the $100 fine, was placed in the custody of the sheriff of Cook County and confined in the House of Correction, there to serve t…
-
United States ex rel. Karl Meyer v. Weil, 458 F.2d 1068 (7th Cir. 1972)…7 Ill.2d 541, 544-545, 268 N.E. 2d 431, cert. den. 404 U.S. 873, 92 S.Ct. 121, 30 L.Ed.2d 116. The Illinois Supreme Court, in the case before us, cited its holding in City of Chicago v. Lawrence, 1969, 42 Ill.2d 461, 464, 248 N.E. 2d 71, cert. den. 396 U.S. 39, 90 S.Ct. 263, 24 L.Ed.2d 208. In Lawrence, the Court had said that an ordinance must be read in a sensible way without giving general terms like “interference” so literal an application as unduly to restrict constitutionally protected conduct, or g…