FRIEDMAN
v.
UNITED STATES
FRIEDMAN
UNITED STATES
395 U.S. 955
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Maine, 420 U.S. 515 (U.S. 1975)…nt against the 13 States bordering on the Atlantic Ocean — Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, [*517] Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, and Florida.1 We granted leave to file, 395 U. S. 955, on June 16, 1969. The complaint asserted a separate cause of action against each of the States which alleged that: “[T]he United States is now entitled, to the exclusion of the defendant State, to exercise sovereign rights over the seabed and subs…
-
United States v. Florida, 425 U.S. 791 (U.S. 1975)
-
United States v. Maine, 469 U.S. 504 (U.S. 1985)…United States, the State of New York, and the State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. I This action, invoking the Court’s original jurisdiction under U. S. Const., Art. III, § 2, and 28 U. S. C. § 1251(b)(2), was instituted in 1969, see 395 U. S. 955, with the filing of a complaint by the United States against the 13 States that border the Atlantic Ocean.2 The purpose of the suit was to determine whether the United States had exclusive rights to the seabed and subsoil underlying the ocean beyond…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence