WATTS
v.
MARYLAND
WATTS
MARYLAND
394 U.S. 214
Supreme Court of the United States (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Palermo, 410 F.2d 468 (7th Cir. 1969)…e defendant to have the witness’ true name, address and place of employment is not absolute. United States v. Varelli, 407 F. 2d 735 (7th Cir. 1969). However, the threat to the witness must be actual and not a result of conjecture. Shaw v. Illinois, 394 U.S. 214, 89 S.Ct. 1016, 22 L.Ed.2d 211 (1969). The government bears the burden of proving to the district judge the existence of such a threat. An actual threat being shown, the government must also disclose to the district judge in camera the relevant inf…
-
United States v. Emil Crovedi, 467 F.2d 1032 (7th Cir. 1972)…ord v. United States, 282 U.S. 687, 51 S.Ct. 77, 75 L.Ed. 736 (1931). . 390 U.S. 129, 88 S.Ct. 748, 19 L.Ed.2d 956 (1968). . United States v. Saletko, 452 F. 2d 193, 196 (7th Cir., 1971), cert. den. 405 U.S. 1040, 92 S.Ct. 1311, 31 L.Ed.2d 581. . 394 U.S. 214, 89 S.Ct. 1016, 22 L.Ed.2d 211 (1969). . People v. Shaw, 89 Ill.App.2d 285, 233 N.E. 2d 73, 78 (First Dist., Fourth Div., 1967). . People v. Shaw, 117 Ill.App.2d 16, 254 N.E. 2d 602, 605 (footnote 2). . Reagan v. United States, 157 U.S 301, 305,…