UNITED JEWISH APPEAL OF GREATER NEW YORK, INC., ET AL.

v.

SCHAEFLER, EXECUTOR, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• United States v. Burkhart, 458 F.2d 201 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …ence any relaxation of the rule or expansion of the exceptions. See United States v. Coleman, 410 F. 2d 1133 (10th Cir. 1969); Moran v. United States, 404 F. 2d 663 (10th Cir. 1968); Holt v. United States, 404 F. 2d 914 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. den., 393 U.S. 1086, 89 S.Ct. 872, 21 L.Ed.2d 779 (1969); Mills v. United States, 367 F. 2d 366 (10th Cir. 1966); and Tandberg-Hanssen v. United States, 284 F. 2d 331 (10th Cir. 1960). Coleman was a Dyer Act prosecution in which the defendant had several times used st…
• United States v. DYE Constr. Co., 510 F.2d 78 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …. denied, 416 U.S. 936, 94 S.Ct. 1934, 40 L.Ed. 286 (1974); United States v. Parker, 469 F. 2d 884, 889 (10th Cir. 1974); United States v. Burkhart, 458 F. 2d 201 (10th Cir. 1972); Holt v. United States, 404 F. 2d 914 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1086, 92 S.Ct. 292, 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1968); Rothering v. United States, 384 F. 2d 385 (10th Cir. 1967); Morgan v. United States, 355 F. 2d 43 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1025, 86 S.Ct. 1976, 16 L.Ed.2d 1029 (1966); Tandberg-Hanssen v. United State…
• United States v. Bishop, 534 F.2d 214 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …ounterfeit does not establish the requisite knowledge essential to the crime of passing or the requisite intent to defraud. Miller v. United States, 392 F. 2d 790 (10th Cir. 1968); Holt v. United States, 404 F. 2d 914 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1086, 89 S.Ct. 872, 21 L.Ed.2d 779 (1969). In Miller, supra, we recognized that while the use of a counterfeit bill by an individual, standing alone, is not sufficient to establish the requisite knowledge and intent, still the jury has the right to eval…