BURGESS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• United States v. Garber, 607 F.2d 92 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …y Wilcox. Significantly, neither James nor the cases following James required actual reliance on Wilcox to ne [*99] gate willful intent.4 Kahr v. CIR, 414 F. 2d 621 (2d Cir. 1969); United States v. Dawson, 400 F. 2d 194 (2d Cir. 1968); cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1023, 89 S.Ct. 632, 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); Nordstrom v. United States, 360 F. 2d 734 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 826, 87 S.Ct. 59, 17 L.Ed.2d 63 (1966). As noted in Critzer: the uncertainty created by Wilcox as a matter of law precluded a de…
• Royal Typewriter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 533 F.2d 1030 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …ns. In assessing the appropriateness of single employer treatment, the fact that day-to-day labor matters are handled at the local level is not controlling. See Darlington Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 397 F. 2d 760, 765 (4th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1023, 89 S.Ct. 632, 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1969); Sakrete of Northern California, Inc. v. NLRB, 332 F. 2d 902, 907 (9th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 961, 85 S.Ct. 649, 13 L.Ed.2d 556 (1965). A more critical test is whether the controlling company posses…
• Elec. Prods. Div. of Midland-Ross Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 617 F.2d 977 (3d Cir. 1980)
  …. See generally Summit Tooling Co., 195 N.L.R.B. 479, 480-81 (1972), enforced without opinion, 474 F. 2d 1352 (7th Cir. 1973). See also Darlington Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 397 F. 2d 760, 773 (4th Cir.) (affirming without discussion), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1023, 89 S.Ct. 632, 21 L.Ed.2d 567 (1968). We do not think it was an abuse of discretion to grant this remedy in the present § 8(a)(3) context. We will enforce the order of preferential hiring lists and relocation expenses. IV. We will deny the employ…