HOLLIS

v.

WISCONSIN

Citator

Cited By

• McGinnis v. Royster, 410 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1973)
  …al penitentiary. See Blackshear v. United States, 434 F. 2d 68 (5th Cir.1970). The federal courts have uniformly upheld the denial of the opportunity to earn good time on this jail time. Bandy v. Willingham, 398 F. 2d 333 (10th Cir.1968), cert. den. 393 U. S. 1006; Aderhold v. Ellis, 84 F. 2d 543 (5th Cir.1936), cert. den. 299 U. S. 587; Swope v. Lawton, 83 F. 2d 814 (9th Cir.1936).” Brief for Appellants 20-21. See supra, at 268, and nn. 7 and 8. The court below stated: “Whatever the merit in defendants’ at…
• Ortega v. United States, 510 F.2d 412 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …iminal defendant is free on bond, either before or after conviction. Polakoff v. United States, 489 F. 2d 727 (5th Cir. 1974); Cochran v. United States, 489 F. 2d 691 (5th Cir. 1974); Bandy v. Willingham, 398 F. 2d 333 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied 393 U.S. 1006, 89 S.Ct. 497, 21 L.Ed.2d 470. We accordingly find no merit to Ortega’s contentions that he should have been granted credit towards sentence for the period of time that he was released on personal recognizance bond. Upon docketing, the parties wer…
• United States v. McCRAY, 468 F.2d 446 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …eral Bureau of Investigation on the basis of information of an outstanding warrant. A police officer may make an arrest on the basis of transmitted information of an outstanding warrant. Bandy v. Willingham, 10 Cir., 398 F. 2d 333, 335, cert. denied 393 U.S. 1006, 89 S.Ct. 497, 21 L.Ed.2d 470. This rule is [*449] recognized in Whiteley v. Warden, 401 U.S. 560, 568, 91 S.Ct. 1031, 28 L.Ed.2d 306, upon which defendant relies. In Whiteley the warrant turned out to be invalid. In the case at bar no attack is mad…