VALENTI
v.
LUMBARD, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. DISTRICT COURT, ET AL.
VALENTI
LUMBARD, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. DISTRICT COURT, ET AL.
393 U.S. 929
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Morgan, 425 F.2d 1388 (5th Cir. 1970)…prisonment on a Dyer Act violation, the statutory maximum sentence for which is five years, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. . As a result the sentencing judge should take care to avoid double credit, Putt v. United States, 392 F. 2d. 64 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 929, 89 S.Ct. 264, 21 L.Ed.2d 266 (1968).…
-
Crosby v. United States, 410 F.2d 1145 (5th Cir. 1969)…to disclose the presentence report. As indicated above, this same contention was considered and rejected on the direct appeal. We need not consider the mat [*1146] ter again. See Putt v. United States, 392 F. 2d 64, 65 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 929, 89 S.Ct. 264, 21 L.Ed.2d 266 (1968). Affirmed.…