FORD

v.

UNITED STATES; AND HOWARD V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Buggs, 904 F.2d 1070 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …plied the drug. Appellant’s Br. at 14. This claim is nothing more than an attack on the credibility of Mr. Perry. Such an issue is for the jury’s determination. See United States ex rel. Morton v. Mancusi, 393 F. 2d 482, 484 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 927, 89 S.Ct. 262, 21 L.Ed.2d 264 (1968).15 Based on the trial testimony, the jury concluded that on June 16, 1988, Mr. Buggs possessed and intended to distribute heroin. We are invited to reassess that testimony, a function we cannot and will not under…
• Hart v. Eyman, 458 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1972)
  …79 S.Ct. 321, 3 L.Ed.2d 296 (1959); Conner v. Wingo, 409 F. 2d 21 (6th Cir. 1969); Maes v. Patterson, 401 F. 2d 200 (10th Cir. 1968); Thompson v. White, 391 F. 2d 724 (5th Cir. 1968); Dentis v. Oklahoma, 376 F. 2d 590 (10th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 927, 89 S.Ct. 261, 21 L.Ed.2d 263 (1968); Elesperman v. Wainwright, 358 F. 2d 259 (5th Cir. 1966). The “conditional order” cases cited by the majority likewise involved preliminary determinations that petitioner was being held in violation of his const…
• United States ex rel. Nelson M. Garcia v. Follette, 417 F.2d 709 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …trial error without constitutional dimensions. See Alexander v. United States ex rel. Kulick, 332 U.S. 174, 67 S.Ct. 1588, 91 L.Ed. 1982 (1947); United States ex rel. Morton v. Mancusi, 393 F. 2d 482 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, Morton v. New York, 393 U.S. 927, 89 S.Ct. 262, 21 L.Ed.2d 264 (1968); United States ex rel. Colon v. Follette, 366 F. 2d 775 (2d Cir. 1966); United States ex rel. Castillo v. Fay, 350 F. 2d 400 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1019, 86 S.Ct. 637, 15 L.Ed.2d 533 (1966). Fina…