IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

v.

STANISIC

Citator

Cited By

• Immigr. & Naturalization Serv. v. Stanisic, 395 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1969)
  …ding conducted under § 242 (b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.2 Petitioner, the [*65] Immigration and Naturalization Service, argues that respondent’s claim was properly heard and determined by a district director.3 We brought the case here, 393 U. S. 912 (1968), to resolve the conflict on this score between the decision below and that of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kordic v. Esperdy, 386 F. 2d 232 (1967). I. Respondent, a national of Yugoslavia, was a crewman aboard the Yugoslav…
• Uniformed Sanitation MEN Ass'n, Inc. v. Comm'r OF Sanitation OF the City OF NEW York, 426 F.2d 619 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …Apricot Grower, Inc., 3 F. 2d 896, 898 (2 Cir. 1924), we see no reason to alter the ruling that the City did not violate former § 605 of the Federal Communications Act, see People v. Canard, 257 Cal.App.2d 444, 65 Cal.Rptr. 15 (1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 912, 89 S.Ct. 231, 21 L.Ed.2d 198 (1968), or the Fourth Amendment, see Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165, 179 n. 11, 89 S.Ct. 961, 22 L.Ed.2d 176 (1969), by tapping its own telephones in search of evidence against faithless employees. Indeed, so f…