ESTATE OF BURNELL
v.
COLORADO
ESTATE OF BURNELL
COLORADO
393 U.S. 13
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fayle v. Stapley, 607 F.2d 858 (9th Cir. 1979)…ate ex rel. Dorothea Dix Hospital v. Davis, 292 N.C. 147, 232 S.E. 2d 698, 702 (1977); Department of Mental Health v. Pauling, 47 Ill.2d 269, 265 N.E. 2d 159, 161 (1970); State v. Estate of Burnell, 165 Colo. 205, 439 P. 2d 38, 40, appeal dismissed, 393 U.S. 13, 89 S.Ct. 46, 21 L.Ed.2d 13 (1968); see also McAuliffe v. Carlson, 377 F.Supp. 896, 899—904 (D.Conn.1974), supplemented, 386 F.Supp. 1245, rev’d on other grounds, 520 F. 2d 1305 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 911, 96 S.Ct. 3199, 49 L.Ed.2d 1…