BROWN ET AL.

v.

RESOR, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY

Citator

Cited By

• Londell Brown and Warren E. Gilliam, Jr. v. Resor, 407 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …Brown v. Reaves, 294 F.Supp. 858. The cases were consolidated on appeal, and Stanley R. Resor, as Secretary of the Army, was subsequently substituted for Major General K. R. Reaves. . Brown v. Reaves, 5 Cir. 1968, 388 F. 2d 682. . Brown v. Resor, 393 U.S. 10, 89 S.Ct. 51, 21 L.Ed.2d 23 (U.S. Oct. 15, 1968). . § 2241 provides in pertinent part: (c) The ’ writ of habeas corpus shall not extend to a prisoner unless— (1) He is in custody under or by color of the authority of the United States or is commi…
• Grubb v. Brig. General William H. Birdsong, Jr., 452 F.2d 516 (6th Cir. 1971)
  …ss, as we discussed in the McAliley case, we believe that an undesirable discharge carries with it “collateral consequences” which, under the rule [*518] of Carafas v. LaVallee, 391 U.S. 234, 88 S.Ct. 1556, 20 L.Ed.2d 554 (1968), and Brown v. Resor, 393 U.S. 10, 89 S.Ct. 51, 21 L.Ed.2d 23 (1968), on remand, 407 F. 2d 281 (5th Cir. 1969), require us to hold that Grubb’s cause is not moot. We therefore turn to the merits of the present appeal. II. Grubb was inducted into the Army on July 9, 1970. On July 2…
• McALILEY v. Brig. General William H. Birdsong, Jr., 451 F.2d 1244 (6th Cir. 1971)
  …391 U.S. at 239, 88 S.Ct. at 1560. That such “collateral consequences” may accompany and persist after a dishonorable discharge from the Armed Forces following court-martial convictions was clearly suggested by the Supreme Court in Brown v. Resor, 393 U. S. 10, 89 S.Ct. 51, 21 L.Ed.2d 23 (1968). There the petitioners had refused to participate in combat training after their requests for conscientious objector discharges were denied by Army officials. Both men were serving at hard labor when they petitione…

Authorities Cited

• Carafas v. Lavallee, 391 U.S. 234 (U.S. 1968)