WOLFF
v.
FOLEY
WOLFF
FOLEY
392 U.S. 933
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Ordonez, 737 F.2d 793 (9th Cir. 1983)…e in the in camera proceedings and to cross-examine the in camera witness or witnesses.” 509 F. 2d at 729. Requiring the informer to appear at an in camera hearing was approved in United States v. Jackson, 384 F. 2d 825 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 933, 88 S.Ct. 2294, 20 L.Ed.2d 1391 (1968) in the following language: “The advantage of the procedure is that it enables the court to view with a keener perspective the factual circumstances upon which it must rule and attaches to the court’s ruling a m…
-
United States v. Winters, 420 F.2d 523 (3d Cir. 1970)…1 not be aided or helped by divulgence of the names of the informants. His decision was made after an in camera interview with the informants, a procedure approved by this Court in United States v. Jackson, 384 F. 2d 825 (3d. Cir. 1967) cert. denied 392 U.S. 933, 88 S.Ct. 2292, 20 L.Ed.2d 1390. The defendant alleges no particular reason why he would be aided by the informants’ presence so as to counterbalance the public interest recognized in Roviaro in “protecting the flow of information.” Although the tri…