WECHSLER ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. Isaacs, 493 F.2d 1124 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …was hardly minimal, incidental, or fortuitous, but rather was central to the criminal scheme. An earlier Fourth Circuit decision cited in Salsbury and relied on by the government here, United States v. Wechsler, 4 Cir., 392 F. 2d 344, cert. denied 392 U.S. 932, 88 S.Ct. 2283, 20 L.Ed.2d 1389, involved the deposit of a check in furtherance of a bribery scheme. A divided court concluded that “[w]hen one deposits a check, there would seem to be little doubt that he is using a facility in interstate commerce”…
• United States v. Archer, 486 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …r. 1970), held that cashing out-of-state checks, with knowledge that they would be cleared through the mails was sufficient to invoke the statute. This followed the earlier decision in United States v. Wechsler, 392 F. 2d 344 (4 Cir.), cert, denied, 392 U.S. 932, 88 S.Ct. 2283, 20 L.Ed.2d 1389 (1968) (“When one deposits a check, there would seem to be little doubt that he is using a facility in interstate commerce.” Id. 392 F. 2d at 347 n. 3). . The Government contends that Bario gave Wasserberger the Saha…
• United States v. Enrico Campanale and Donald Matthews, 518 F.2d 352 (9th Cir. 1975)
  …ate of the chapter. 18 U.S.C. § 1961(5). [*365] The success of this approach in complying with constitutional constraints has been judicially acknowledged in other contexts. In United States v. Wechsler, 392 F. 2d 344 (4th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 932, 88 S.Ct. 2283, 20 L.Ed.2d 1389 (1968), acts carrying out the objectives of a bribe were held violative of 18 U.S.C. § 1952 even though the statute was enacted after the bribe was tendered and received but before the performance of the act for which…