HUJUS

v.

WASHINGTON

Citator

Cited By

• THE Florida BAR v. Vernell, 721 So. 2d 705 (Fla. 1998)
  …has held that because Bar disciplinary proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature, attorneys must know the charges they face before proceedings commence. See In re Ruffalo, 390 U.S. 544, 88 S.Ct. 1222, 20 L.Ed.2d 117 (1968), modified on other grounds, 392 U.S. 919, 88 S.Ct. 2257, 20 L.Ed.2d 1380 (1968). The absence of fair notice as to the reach of the procedure deprives the attorney of due process. See id. (where attorney in disbarment proceeding had no notice that his employment of certain persons would b…
• Alderman v. United States, 394 U.S. 165 (U.S. 1969)
  …tioners and their counsel only those materials arguably relevant to their prosecution. Petitioners opposed the motion, and the matter was argued before the Court last Term. We then set the case down for reargument at the opening of the current Term, 392 U. S. 919 (1968), the attention of the parties being directed to the disclosure issue and the question of [*169] standing to object to the Government’s use of the fruits of illegal surveillance.2 Nos. 11 and 197. Both petitioners were convicted of conspiring…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Varelli, 407 F.2d 735 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …acity, cross-examination should be allowed on retrial. EAVESDROPPING Under the rule laid down by the Supreme Court in Kolod v. United States, 390 U.S. 136, 88 S.Ct. 752, 19 L.Ed.2d 962 (1968), rehearing granted, sub nom. Alderman v. United States, 392 U.S. 919, 88 S.Ct. 2257, 20 L.Ed.2d 1381 (1968), the district court on retrial must make an in camera inspection of the logs of any electronically overheard conversations involving any defendants in this case. PROSECUTOR’S ERRORS Appellants claim that the…