HOPPER ET AL.
v.
LOUISIANA
HOPPER ET AL.
LOUISIANA
392 U.S. 658
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 20 L. Ed. 2d 1347 · 88 S. Ct. 2281 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1168 · SCDB 1967-194
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, and Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
Mr. Justice Black dissents.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Parker v. Randolph, 442 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1979)…nt, are deliberately spread before the jury in a joint trial.” Id., at 135-136. Mr. Justice SteveNS, in dissent, states that our holding “squarely overrule[s]” this Court’s decisions in Roberts v. Russell, 392 U. S. 293 (1968); Hopper v. Louisiana, 392 U. S. 658 (1968); Brown v. United States, 411 U. S. 223 (1973); and Harrington v. California, 395 U. S. 250 (1969). “In all four of these cases,” according to the dissent, “the Court found a Bruton error even though the defendants’ confessions interlocked.” P…1 / 2
-
United States v. Schwartz, 398 F.2d 464 (7th Cir. 1968)…Defendants do not argue that this case does not involve extortion under that provision of the Utah Code. Therefore, United States v. Nardello, No. 51, October Term 1967, in which the Supreme Court recently noted probable jurisdiction (392 U.S. 923, 88 S.Ct. 2281, 20 L.Ed.2d 1382), is not applicable. . Thorn positively identified Schwartz outside the United States Commissioner’s room in the United States Courthouse in Camden, New Jersey, in September 1966. . Section 1952 prescribes a $10,000 maximum fine o…
Authorities Cited
- Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1968)