GOLDMAN
v.
NEW YORK

U.S. | 1968-06-17
No. 1261
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.
392 U.S. 643 Supreme Court of the United States (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States ex rel. Joseph Annunziato v. Deegan, 440 F.2d 304 (2d Cir. 1971)
    …ich included both exhausted and unexhausted claims. United States ex rel. Levy v. McMann, supra, at 404 n. 3. . See People v. Goldman, 21 N.Y.2d 152, 287 N.Y.S.2d 7, 234 N.E. 2d 194 (1967), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 392 U.S. 643 (1968), rehearing denied, 393 U.S. 899 (1968). In Goldman, on facts closely analogous to those in the instant case, the New York Court of Appeals affirmed a perjury conviction of a New York City policeman who had signed a waiver of immunity prior to…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw