HILLMAN
v.
FLORIDA
HILLMAN
FLORIDA
392 U.S. 307
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123. See Roberts v. Russell, ante, p. 293.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice White’s dissenting opinion in Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123, 138 (1968).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Waddell v. Louie L. Wainwright, 410 F.2d 736 (5th Cir. 1969)…rontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.” 391 U.S. 123, 126, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 1622, 20 L.Ed.2d 476. The Court then reversed. In the recent cases of Williams v. Florida, 1968, 392 U.S. 306, 88 S.Ct. 2064, 20 L.Ed.2d 1112, and Hillman v. Florida, 1968, 392 U.S. 307, 88 S.Ct. 2065, 20 L.Ed.2d 1114, both of said petitioners having been co-defendants with Benny Brooks and the petitioner in the case sub judice, the United States Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Florida First District Court of Appeal and…
Authorities Cited
- Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1968)