FAIR

v.

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 (U.S. 1969)
  …t search warrant cases. Believing it desirable that the principles of Aguilar should be further explicated, we granted certiorari, 390 U. S. 942, our writ being later limited to the question of the constitutional validity of the search and seizure.2 391 U. S. 933. For reasons that follow we reverse. In Aguilar, a search warrant had issued upon an affidavit of police officers who swore only that they had “received reliable information from a credible person and do believe” that narcotics were being illegally…
• Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 395 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1969)
  …our-year period preceding May 22, 1963, the date Zenith’s counterclaim was filed.2 Finally, the Court of Appeals struck the injunction against HRI’s participation in conspiracies restricting Zenith’s trade in foreign markets. We granted certiorari, 391 U. S. 933, to consider among other things the question whether the Court of Appeals properly discharged its appellate function under Rule 52 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which specifies that the findings of fact made by a district Court sittin…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong, 393 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1969)
  …at part of the order, the Court of Appeals said, “is an order to respondent to carry out provisions of the contract and is beyond the power of the Board.” 386 F. 2d 929, 933 (1967). The Government sought and we granted certiorari as to this holding. 391 U. S. 933 (1968). Believing the remedy provided by the Board was well within its powers, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Section 10 (c) of the Act empowers the Board when it adjudicates an unfair labor practice to issue “an order requiring…