GOLDBLATT
v.
CITY OF DALLAS
GOLDBLATT
CITY OF DALLAS
391 U.S. 360
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Goldblatt v. The City OF Dallas, 414 F.2d 774 (5th Cir. 1969)…sought to appeal the decision of the district court (which sat as a statutory three-judge court, Title 28 U.S.C., Sec. 2281) directly to the Supreme Court pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C., Section 1253. The Supreme Court in Goldblatt v. City of Dallas, 391 U.S. 360, 88 S.Ct. 1666, 20 L.Ed.2d 646 (1968) stated that it did not have jurisdiction. The basis of this determination, the parties inform us, was that the Dallas City Charter was not of sufficient state wide application to warrant a three-judge district c…