LORENZANA
v.
WARDEN, RIO PIEDRAS, PUERTO RICO, PENITENTIARY; CROSBY V. TAHASH, WARDEN; AND CARTER V. NELSON, WARDEN
LORENZANA
WARDEN, RIO PIEDRAS, PUERTO RICO, PENITENTIARY; CROSBY V. TAHASH, WARDEN; AND CARTER V. NELSON, WARDEN
390 U.S. 1022
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Container Corp. of Am., 393 U.S. 333 (U.S. 1969)…price-fixing agreement in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act.1 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1. The District Court dismissed the complaint. 273 F. Supp. 18. The case is here on appeal, 15 U. S. C. § 29; and we noted probable jurisdiction. 390 U. S. 1022. The case as proved is unlike any other price decisions we have rendered. There was here an exchange of price information but no agreement to adhere to a price schedule as in Sugar Institute v. United States, 297 U. S. 553, or United States v. Soco…