BROWN

v.

CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307 (U.S. 1971)
  …tes, 252 F. 2d 680, 681 [*316] (CA6), cert. denied, 356 U. S. 964 (1958); Edmaiston v. Neil, 452 F. 2d 494 (CA6 1971); United States v. Panczko, 367 F. 2d 737, 738-739 (CA7 1966); Terlikowski v. United States, 379 F. 2d 501, 504 (CA8), cert. denied, 389 U. S. 1008 (1967); Foley v. United States, 290 F. 2d 562, 565 (CA8 1961); Benson v. United States, 402 F. 2d 576, 579 (CA9 1968); Venus v. United States, 287 F. 2d 304, 307 (CA9 1960), rev’d per curiam on other grounds, 368 U. S. 345 (1961); D’Aquino v. United…
• United States v. Skillman, 442 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …es, 422 F. 2d 925 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. McCarthy, 422 F. 2d 160 (2nd Cir. 1970), petition for cert. dismissed, 398 U.S. 946, 90 S.Ct. 1864, 26 L.Ed.2d 286 (1970); Terlikowski v. United States, 379 F. 2d 501 (8th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1008, 88 S.Ct. 569, 19 L.Ed.2d 604 (1968). It is settled law in this circuit that the Sixth Amendment applies only from the date of commencement of the criminal prosecution. There is here no evidence of intention of vexatious delay on the part of the go…
• Hodges v. United States, 408 F.2d 543 (8th Cir. 1969)
  …). If we focus on Rule 48(b), rather than on the Sixth Amendment, our standard then is whether Judge Duncan’s refusal to dismiss the indictment was an abuse of discretion. Terlikowski v. United States, 379 F. 2d 501, 504 (8 Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1008, 88 S.Ct. 569, 19 L.Ed.2d 604 ; Foley v. United States, 290 F. 2d 562, 566 (8 Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 888, 82 S.Ct. 139, 7 L.Ed.2d 88. Most of the factors discussed above with respect to the Sixth Amendment are equally pertinent and appli…