STEWART-WARNER CORP.

v.

BISHMAN MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …ad, 495 F. 2d 1154, 1156 (9th Cir. 1974); Winchester v. United States, 394 F. 2d 489 (9th Cir. 1968); Howard v. United States, 128 U.S.App.D.C. 336, 340, 389 F. 2d 287, 291 (1967); Cohen v. United States, 378 F. 2d 751, 755 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897, 88 S.Ct. 217, 19 L.Ed.2d 215 (1967). . The main distinction between specific and general intent is the element of bad or evil purpose which is required for the former. Thus a person who knowingly commits an act which the law makes a crime may be s…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …under this section requires defining at what point the act of transporting explosives is completed. Clearly, the Government has some discretion in making this determination. Thus, in Cohen v. United States, 378 F. 2d 751 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897, 88 S.Ct. 217, 19 L.Ed.2d 215 (1967), the court upheld a count that charged defendants with knowingly transmitting wagering information by telephone between specified geographic points, during a specified time period, and for a specified purpose, ev…
• United States v. Southard, 700 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …endant knew or could reasonably foresee that interstate communication would be used in furtherance of the plan of action.” Id. at 249. The Ninth Circuit made the same assumption in Cohen v. United States, 378 F. 2d 751, 754 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 897, 88 S.Ct. 217, 19 L.Ed.2d 215 (1967), when it considered and rejected appellant’s argument that “the evidence was insufficient to show his awareness that the telephone calls originated outside Nevada.” The government’s argument is two-pronged. Fir…