KITCHEN

v.

REESE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc., 881 F.2d 866 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …counsel did not object, but more significantly, no specific error and prejudice has been claimed by appellants. United States v. Ellzey, 874 F. 2d 324, 330-31 (6th Cir.1989); Edwards v. United States, 374 F. 2d 24, 26 (10th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850, 88 S.Ct. 48, 19 L.Ed.2d 120 (1967). Accordingly, reversal on these points is unwarranted. C. At the end of one day’s deliberation, the jury foreman sent the court a note advising that the jury was unable to reach a verdict. Appellants contend th…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Cont'l Tobacco Co. OF S.C., Inc., 463 F.2d 137 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …e or of the mails to sell or offer to sell securities without having first filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission”, United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corporation, 4 Cir., 1967, 376 F. 2d 675, 677, cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850, 88 S.Ct. 38, 19 L.Ed.2d 119. However, this “broad and all-encompassing prohibition against the use of the mails or means of interstate commerce to sell unregistered securities must be read in conjunction with the claimed exemptions which are in th…
• United States v. United Med. & Surgical Supply Corp., 989 F.2d 1390 (4th Cir. 1993)
  …ounsel is not a complete defense to an allegation of willful misconduct, but is merely one factor a jury may consider when determining Buchanan’s state of mind. United States v. Custer Channel Wing Corp., 376 F. 2d 675, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 850, 88 S.Ct. 38, 19 L.Ed.2d 119 (1967). This issue was presented to the jury and the jury evidently decided that Buchanan’s interaction with his counsel did not preclude a finding that he acted willfully. The evidence presented at trial supports the.…