NEWMAN ET AL.

v.

PIGGIE PARK ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Newman v. Piggie Park Enters., Inc., 390 U.S. 400 (U.S. 1968)
  …n advanced “for purposes of delay and not in good faith.” 377 F. 2d, at 437. We granted certiorari to decide whether this subjective standard properly effectuates the purposes of the counsel-fee provision of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 389 U. S. 815. We hold that it does not. When the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed, it was evident that enforcement would prove difficult and that the Nation would have to rely in part upon private litigation as a means of securing broad compliance with the l…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Ins. Co. of Am., 390 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1968)
  …the Board’s order. 371 F. 2d 316 (C. A. 7th Cir.). The importance of the question in the context involved to the administration of the [*256] National Labor Relations Act prompted us to grant the petitions of the Board and the Union for certiorari. 389 U. S. 815. At the outset the critical issue is what standard or standards should be applied in differentiating “employee” from “independent contractor” as those terms are used in the Act. Initially this Court held in NLRB v. Hearst Publications, 322 U. S. 11…
• In re Ruffalo, 390 U.S. 544 (U.S. 1968)
  …the other one did; and it disbarred petitioner from practice in that Court. 370 F. 2d 447 (C. A. 6th Cir.). The dissenting judge thought that neither charge justified suspension from practice.1 Id., at 460. The case is here on a writ of certiorari. 389 U. S. 815. [*546] Petitioner was an active trial lawyer who handled many Federal Employers’ Liability Act cases. The Association of American Railroads investigated his handling of claims and referred charges of impropriety to the President of the Mahoning Cou…