PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
v.
BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.
BALTIMORE SHIPPERS & RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., ET AL.
389 U.S. 583
Supreme Court of the United States (1968)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Transway Corp. v. Hawaiian Express Serv., Inc., 679 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1982)…are not exempt from Commission regulation under Part IV of the Act, then PUC regulation is preempted, because inconsistent with federal law. Baltimore Shippers & Receivers Ass’n v. Public Utilities Comm’n, 268 F.Supp. 836, 843 (N.D.Cal.1967), aff’d, 389 U.S. 583, 88 S.Ct. 694, 19 L.Ed.2d 783 (1968). . The terminal area of a municipality includes all points within the “commercial zone” of a municipality (as defined in Commercial Zones and Terminal Areas, 46 M.C.C. 665, 699 (1946)), and not beyond the territ…