UMANS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1967-11-06
No. 41
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
389 U.S. 80 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 19 L. Ed. 2d 255 · 88 S. Ct. 253 · 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2932 · SCDB 1967-018
Cited by 166 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. Mr. Justice Harlan

Per Curiam.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Mr. Justice Harlan would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals substantially for the reasons stated in Judge Waterman’s opinion for that court in United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

  • United States v. Evans, 572 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1978)
    …orrupted or influenced, but simply the acceptance of an unauthorized compensation. See United States v. Brewster, 506 F. 2d 62, 72-74 n.26 (D.C. Cir.1974);30 United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 728-30 (2d Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 80, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967); United States v. Irwin, supra. CL United States v. Forgione, 487 F. 2d 364, 365 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 976, 94 S.Ct. 1561, 39 L.Ed.2d 872 (1974); May v. United States, 84 U.S.App. D.C. 233,175 F. 2d 994, cert…
  • United States v. Bennett, 409 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1969)
    …testimony is unavailable or when it is demonstrably inconvenient to summon witnesses able to testify to facts from personal knowledge,” United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80, 88 S.Ct. 253, [*901] 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967). See United States v. Arcuri, 405 F. 2d 691 (2 Cir. 1968) and eases there cited. Here it was impossible to have Lewis testify at the time of the first superseding indictment, and no purpose would have been served by req…
    1 / 2
  • United States v. Estepa, 471 F.2d 1132 (2d Cir. 1972)
    …68). We had hoped that, with the clear warnings we have given to prosecutors, going back to United States v. Umans, 368 F. 2d 725, 730 (2 Cir. 1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 940, 87 S.Ct. 975, 17 L.Ed.2d 872 cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 389 U.S. 80, 88 S.Ct. 253, 19 L.Ed.2d 255 (1967), and the assurances given by United States Attorneys, see United States v. Arcuri, supra, 405 F. 2d at 693 & n. 4, a reversal for improper use of hearsay before the grand jury would not be required. Here the Assi…

Previewing 3 of 36 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw