ALI, AKA CLAY, ET AL.

v.

CONNALLY ET AL., U. S. DISTRICT JUDGES

Citator

Cited By

• Grosso v. United States, 390 U.S. 62 (U.S. 1968)
  …ersed in its entirety. It is so ordered. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. After argument, the case was returned to the calendar, and set for reargument at the 1967 Term, again with Marchetti, sufra. 388 U. S. 904. Counsel were asked to argue, in addition to the original questions, the following: “(1) What relevance, if any, has the required records doctrine, Shapiro v. United States, 335 U. S. 1, to the validity under the Fifth Amendment of the obligation to…
• Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (U.S. 1968)
  …ors.” The conviction was affirmed without opinion by the Appellate Term, Second Department, of the Supreme Court. Appellant was denied leave to appeal to the New York Court of Appeals and then appealed to this Court. We noted probable jurisdiction. 388 U. S. 904. We affirm.2 [*634] I. The “girlie” picture magazines involved in the sales here are not obscene for adults, Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.3 But § 484r-h does not bar the appellant [*635] from stocking the magazines and selling them to persons…
• United States v. Emilio Pizzarello, 386 F.2d 177 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …pellant is the constitutional question. However, we refrain from discussing it in view of the fact that it is presently before the Supreme Court in Marchetti v. United States, 388 U.S. 903, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1343 and Grosso v. United States, 388 U.S. 904, 87 S.Ct. 2097, 18 L.Ed.2d 1343 (October 31, 1967), and adhere to the position taken by this court in many cases in which it has refused to find the statute unconstitutional.…