LOUIE

v.

WASHINGTON

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• State v. Zamora, 534 So. 2d 864 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …CA 1965)). These factors, however, seem primarily relevant in assessing whether the defendant’s due process right to cross examine a state witness has been abridged. . See McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300, 87 S.Ct. 1056, 18 L.Ed.2d 62, reh. denied, 386 U.S. 1042, 87 S.Ct. 1474, 18 L.Ed.2d 616 (1967); State v. Kirksey, 418 So. 2d 1152, 1154 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); State v. White, 418 So. 2d 411, 412 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); State v. Martinez, 381 So. 2d 1183, 1184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); State v. Katz, 295 So. 2d 356 (F…
• State v. White, 418 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)
  …se the identity of a confidential informant who merely furnishes the probable cause basis for a search or an arrest. State v. Martinez, 381 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300, 87 S.Ct. 1056, 18 L.Ed.2d 62, reh’g denied, 386 U.S. 1042, 87 S.Ct. 1474, 18 L.Ed.2d 616 (1967); State v. Katz, 295 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); State v. Matney. Unless a defendant can establish that it will be necessary for the prosecution to refer to the informer in the presentation of its case, or t…
• State v. Martinez, 381 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …of Florida that the state is not required to disclose the identity of a confidential informant who merely furnishes the probable cause basis for a search or an arrest. See, McCray v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300, 87 S.Ct. 1056, 18 L.Ed.2d 62, reh. denied, 386 U.S. 1042, 87 S.Ct. 1474, 18 L.Ed.2d 616 (1967); State v. Katz, 295 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); State v. Matney, 236 So. 2d 166 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970); Pearson v. State, 190 So. 2d 425 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 200 So. 2d 814 (Fla.1967); Dasher v. St…