RUBY
v.
TEXAS
RUBY
TEXAS
386 U.S. 930
Supreme Court of the United States (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Helix Milling Co. v. Terminal Flour Mills Co. & Gen. Foods Corp., 523 F.2d 1317 (9th Cir. 1975)…ave made the sale and that Helix would have been able to purchase it and re-enter the milling and sales market, see Martin v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 365 F. 2d 629 (5th Cir.), cert. den. 385 U.S. 991, 87 S.Ct. 600, 17 L.Ed.2d 451 (1966), reh. denied 386 U.S. 930, 87 S.Ct. 851, 17 L.Ed.2d 804 (1967). Our holding is a limited one, given the unusual factual context of this case. We are not unmindful of the fact that Helix has abandoned its allegation that defendants acted with the specific anticompetitive pur…
-
Londell Brown and Warren E. Gilliam, Jr. v. Resor, 407 F.2d 281 (5th Cir. 1969)…nt for correction and completion and direct him to return the same so completed and corrected on or before a specified date.” . See also Webb v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1966, 362 F. 2d 105, cert. denied 385 U.S. 940, 87 S.Ct. 307, 17 L.Ed.2d 219, cert. denied 386 U.S. 930, 87 S.Ct. 876, 17 L.Ed.2d 804; Fortner v. Balkcom, 5 Cir. 1967, 380 F. 2d 816; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 392 F. 2d 74; Doughty v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 396 F. 2d 128. . 50 U.S.O.A.App. § 462 provides in part: No person shall be tried by court marti…