ANDERS
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1967-03-13
No. 12
Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.
386 U.S. 264 Supreme Court of the United States (1967) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are' granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Guillory v. State, 626 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)
    …PER CURIAM. This appeal is filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 264, 87 S.Ct. 1032, 18 L.Ed.2d 40 (1967). We affirm the judgment but remand this case for correction of the sentence. The written sentence fails to note that the sentence imposed in case number' 92-2638 is to run concurrently with the eighteen-month con…
  • United States v. Williams, 379 F.2d 319 (2d Cir. 1967)
    …advocate upon appeal, and we have been fully advised of the facts of record and the legal contentions which can be based upon them. Compare Camodeo v. United States, 387 U.S. 575, 87 S.Ct. 2070, 18 L.Ed.2d 966 (1967); Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 264, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Accordingly, we grant the motion and relieve Anthony F. Marra, Esq., Joshua N. Koplovitz, Esq., and the Legal Aid Society from their assignment. . Paragrajih (III) (5) of this court’s plan under the Criminal…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw