JENNINGS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Enright, 579 F.2d 980 (6th Cir. 1978)
  …himself a conspirator, stated to Taylor that he was paying Enright $125 a month. Generally the admission of tape recordings is committed to the discretion of the trial court. United States v. Cooper, 365 F. 2d 246, 250 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1030, 87 S.Ct. 760, 17 L.Ed.2d 677 (1967). The record reveals that the court most carefully considered the objections that portions of the recording were inaudible, rendering the remainder thereof subject to being taken out of context. Our review of the…
• United States v. Jackson, 482 F.2d 1167 (10th Cir. 1973)
  …ied, 401 U.S. 980, 91 S.Ct. 1213, 28 L.Ed.2d 331 (1971). An error possibly prejudicial in a close case does not require reversal if the evidence of defendant’s guilt is strong. Jennings v. United States, 364 F. 2d 513 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1030, 87 S.Ct. 760, 17 L.Ed.2d 677 (1967); Fed.Rules Crim.Proc., 18 U.S.C. Rule 52(a). Without exhibit 36 the evidence against Gainous is still strong and substantial. Considering the record as a whole, we are unable to say Gainous was prejudiced by adm…
• United States v. Clarence Samuel Robinson (80-5479), 707 F.2d 872 (6th Cir. 1983)
  …portions. It is well settled that the admission of tape recordings at trial rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. United States v. Enright, 579 F. 2d at 988. United States v. Cooper, 365 F. 2d 246, 250 (6th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1030, 87 S.Ct. 760, 17 L.Ed.2d 677 (1967). That discretion presumes, as a prerequisite to admission, that the tapes be authentic, accurate and trustworthy. United States v. Haldeman, 559 F. 2d 31 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied sub nom. Mitchell v. United S…