OWINGS
v.
UNITED STATES COURT OF MILITARY APPEALS ET AL.; OPELA V. UNITED STATES; GUNSTON V. UNITED STATES; MANNA V. UNITED STATES; DELESPINE V. TEXAS; MOTTE ET AL. V. RYAN, CHIEF JUDGE, U. S. DISTRICT COURT; GREGORY V. NEW YORK; MORGAN V. UNITED STATES; WHISMAN V. GEORGIA; GREAR V. MAXWELL ET AL.; VUCKSON V. UNITED STATES; SMITH V. REINCKE, WARDEN; MATLOCK V. UNITED STATES; KRZYZEWSKA V. ILLINOIS ET AL.; JULIANO V. OHIO ET AL.; FORMAN ET AL. V. CITY OF MONTGOMERY; DEAL V. CALIFORNIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1966-10-10
Nos. 1325; No. 1333; No. 1338; No. 1341; No. 1342; No. 1347; No. 1369; No. 1373; No. 1381; No. 1383; No. 1407; No. 1422; No. 1459; No. 1530; No. 1542; No. 1556; No. 1601
385 U.S. 893 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Licursi, 525 F.2d 1164 (2d Cir. 1975)
    …Ct. 766, 769, 93 L.Ed. 919 (1949), quoting from United States v. Peoni, 100 F. 2d 401, 402 (2 Cir., 1938); United States v. Manna, 353 F. 2d 191, 192 (2 Cir., 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 975, 86 S.Ct. 1868, 16 L.Ed.2d 685 (1966), rehearing denied, 385 U.S. 893, 87 S.Ct. 25, 17 L.Ed.2d 126. The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, clearly demonstrates that Licursi took an active part in the consummation of Caufield’s crime of selling cocaine and that he sought, by his own action…
  • United States v. Edwards, 443 F.2d 1286 (8th Cir. 1971)
    …to be taken by the jury as conclusively proven.” Accord, Osborne v. United States, 351 F. 2d 111, 120 (8th Cir. 1965); Vuckson v. United States, 354 F. 2d 918, 921 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 991, 86 S.Ct. 1896, 16 L.Ed.2d 1007, reh. denied, 385 U.S. 893, 87 S.Ct. 27, 17 L.Ed.2d 127 (1966). Smith v. United States, 363 F. 2d 143, 145 (5th Cir. 1966), is cited by Edwards on this proposition, but is distinguishable by reason of the fact that in Smith there was no stipulation relating to the oath and no…
  • Matlock v. United States, 391 F.2d 238 (6th Cir. 1968)
    …L.Ed. 369 (1965). The conviction for the Counce robbery was affirmed by this Court. United States v. Burkeen, 355 F. 2d 241 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied Matlock v. United States, 384 U.S. 957, 86 S.Ct. 1582, 16 L.Ed.2d 553 (1966), rehearing denied 385 U.S. 893, 87 S.Ct. 28, 17 L.Ed.2d 127 (1966). On August 31, 1965, Matlock filed five separate applications for post conviction relief in the District Court, all of which were denied. On March 7, 1966, he filed a motion to vacate sentence imposed for the Env…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw