MICHAELS

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sheiner, 410 F.2d 337 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …t may be proved by all the facts and circumstances disclosed by the evidence taken in connection with the case. Anderson v. United States, 270 F. 2d 124, 127 (6th Cir. 1959); see United States v. Carlson, 359 F. 2d 592, 597 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 879, 87 S.Ct. 161, 17 L.Ed.2d 106 (1966). Thus, in cases of criminally passing counterfeit United States obligations, guilty knowledge has been held properly inferable from a variety of circumstances, including the incredibility of the defendant’s expl…
• Am. Commuters Ass'n, Inc. v. Levitt, 405 F.2d 1148 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …Elections of the City of New York, 380 F. 2d 445 (2 Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1048, 88 S.Ct. 768, 19 L.Ed.2d 840 (1968); Offerman v. Nitkowski, 378 F. 2d 22 (2 Cir. 1967); Hall v. State of New York, 359 F. 2d 26, 27 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 879, 87 S.Ct. 161, 17 L.Ed.2d 106 (1966).2 Quoting from California Water Service Co. v. City of Redding, 304 U.S. 252, 58 S.Ct. 865, 82 L.Ed. 1323 (1938), we stated in Green, supra at 448, that “The lack of substantiality in a federal question may appea…
• United States v. Nemecio Cervantes, 466 F.2d 736 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …392 F. 2d at 792). The jury may scrutinize the entire conduct of the defendant at or near the time when the money was passed (Paz, supra 387 F. 2d at 301; United States v. Carlson, 359 F. 2d 592, 597 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, Bonomo v. United States, 385 U.S. 879, 87 S.Ct. 161, 17 L.Ed.2d 106 (1966)) and may consider evidence of like offenses (United States v. Platt, 156 F. 2d 326, 327 (7th Cir. 1946)). The fact that, a few months after the passing of the $20 counterfeit bill at the drive-in, Panas actually…