HALL
v.
MISSISSIPPI

U.S. | 1966-11-14
No. 672
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction., Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
385 U.S. 98 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Mrs. Catherine T. Pendergraft v. Cook, 433 F.2d 969 (5th Cir. 1970)
    …i statute which was in effect at the time of the indictment and trial of the appellee. See dissenting opinion of Chief Justice Etheridge of the Supreme Court of Mississippi in Hall v. Mississippi, 187 So. 2d 861 (Mississippi 1966), appeal dismissed, 385 U.S. 98, 87 S.Ct. 331, 17 L.Ed.2d 196 (1966) and see White v. Crook, U.S.D.C.M.D.Ala., 1966, 251 F.Supp. 401, holding a similar Alabama statute unconstitutional, c. f. Hoyt v. Florida, 368 U.S. 57, 82 S.Ct. 159, 7 L.Ed.2d 118, in which the Supreme Court str…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw