CROSS
v.
BRUNING, COUNTY CLERK OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, ET AL.
CROSS
BRUNING, COUNTY CLERK OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, ET AL.
385 U.S. 14
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cross v. Bruning, 413 F.2d 678 (9th Cir. 1969)…ionality of the California statutes have been presented to the Supreme Court in two prior cases, one being the 1964 case reported in 379 U.S. 202, 85 S.Ct. 340,13 L.Ed.2d 339, discussed hereinabove, and the other being a 1966 case, Cross v. Bruning, 385 U.S. 14, 87 S.Ct. 116, 17 L.Ed.2d 13. But counsel does not recognize that the 1966 case was not, like the 1964 case, a decision by the Supreme Court on the merits, but only a denial of a writ of certiorari in a case not within the obligatory jurisdiction of…1 / 3