ORTEGA
v.
COX, WARDEN
ORTEGA
COX, WARDEN
384 U.S. 977
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Martinez v. United States, 373 F.2d 810 (10th Cir. 1967)…States, 10 Cir., 183 F. 2d 944, cert. denied, 340 U.S. 877, 71 S.Ct. 123, 95 L.Ed. 637; Maestas v. United States, 10 Cir., 341 F. 2d 493; Jordan v. United States, 10 Cir., 348 F. 2d 433; Lucas v. United States, 10 Cir., 355 F. 2d 245, cert. denied, 384 U.S. 977, 86 S.Ct. 1873, 16 L.Ed.2d 687; Robinson v. United States, 10 Cir., 366 F. 2d 575, cert. denied, 385 U.S. 889, 87 S.Ct. 717, 17 L.Ed.2d 547. . Rule 52(a) F.R.Crim.P.…
-
United States v. Gurule, 522 F.2d 20 (10th Cir. 1975)…witnesses. These are exclusive functions of the jury and not those of the appellate court. United States v. Gibson, supra; United States v. Weiss, 431 F. 2d 1402 (10th Cir. 1970); Lucas v. United States, 355 F. 2d 245 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 977, 86 S.Ct. 1873, 16 L.Ed.2d 687 (1966). We hold that the question of entrapment was one of fact for determination by the jury based on conflicting evidence, involving the issue of credibility; that it was properly submitted to the jury; and that the…
-
Scotty Shirley Hanks v. United States, 388 F.2d 171 (10th Cir. 1968)…. Rule 30, F.R.Crim.P. requires that objections to instructions or omissions therefrom be made before the jury retires to consider its verdict or the error may not be raised on appeal. See Lucas v. United States, 10 Cir., 355 F. 2d 245, cert, denied 384 U.S. 977, 86 S.Ct. 1873, 16 L.Ed.2d 687; Beasley v. United States, 10 Cir., 327 F. 2d 566, cert, denied 377 U.S. 944, 84 S.Ct. 1351, 12 L.Ed.2d 307. The information charged only the greater offense. The case was tried and submitted to the jury on this charge…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence