BIGGS RENTAL CO.
v.
UNITED STATES
BIGGS RENTAL CO.
UNITED STATES
384 U.S. 927
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pitchford v. Pepi, Inc., 531 F.2d 92 (3d Cir. 1975)…e development of Portaspec. . Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F. 2d 727, 732-34 (3d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974, 91 S.Ct. 1190, 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); Ash v. International Bus. Mach. Corp., 353 F. 2d 491 (3d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 927, 86 S.Ct. 1446, 16 L.Ed.2d 531 (1966). . Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co., 183 F. 704, 709 (3d Cir. 1910). . See Vermilion Foam Products v. General Electric Co., 386 F.Supp. 255 (E.D.Mich.1974) (dictum). Cf. Harrison v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., 115 F.Su…
-
Melvyn I. Weiss v. Temp. Inv. Fund, Inc., 692 F.2d 928 (3d Cir. 1982)…ch of trust in some other way. Landy v. FDIC, 486 F. 2d 139, 149 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 960, 94 S.Ct. 1979, 40 L.Ed.2d 312 (1974), quoting Ash v. International Business Machines, Inc., 353 F. 2d 491, 493 (3d Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 927, 86 S.Ct., 1446, 16 L.Ed.2d 531 (1966). Weiss’ allegations do not, however, state with particularity reasons why the directors would not be able properly to make the choice whether to sue. “Instead of being ‘a statement of appropriate and convincing…