BLACK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Black v. United States, 385 U.S. 26 (U.S. 1966)
  …ring now raises a similar question and while Davis v. United States, supra, is not controlling, its relation is obvious. In Black the Solicitor General advised the Court voluntarily on May 24, 1966, after the petition for certiorari had been denied, 384 U. S. 927, but before an application for rehearing had been filed, that agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in a matter unrelated to this case, on February 7, 1963, installed a listening device in petitioner’s hotel suite in Washington, D. C. The…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Covello, 410 F.2d 536 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …revelation of monitoring activity, Covello’s reliance on Black v. United States, 385 U.S. 26, 87 S.Ct. 190, 17 L.Ed.2d 26 (1966), va- [*548] eating and remanding 122 U.S.App.D.C. 347, 353 F. 2d 885 (1965), in which cer-tiorari was initially denied, 384 U.S. 927, but granted upon rehearing, 384 U.S. 983, 86 S.Ct. 1884, 16 L.Ed.2d 1002 (1966), and O’Brien v. United States, 386 U.S. 345, 87 S.Ct. 1158, 18 L.Ed.2d 94 (1967), which he offers to support his claim that he is entitled to a new trial is misplaced.…
• Kauffman v. The Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727 (3d Cir. 1970)
  …sistently held that the primary wrong is to the corporate body and, accordingly, that the shareholder, experiencing no direct harm, possesses no primary right to sue. Ash v. International Business Machines, 353 F. 2d 491 (3 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 927, 86 S.Ct. 1446, 16 L.Ed.2d 531 (1966); Loeb v. Eastman Kodak Co., 183 F. 704 (3 Cir. 1910). [*733] Conceding the basic vitality of this rule, appellee contends that the mutual fund is a novel corporate structure and that the unique relationship of t…