JENKINS
v.
BIRZGALIS, STATE HOSPITAL SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.

U.S. | 1966-06-06
No. 1495
384 U.S. 435 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Concepcion Carrasco and Francisco Diaz, 887 F.2d 794 (7th Cir. 1989)
    …that he was ‘acusado’ or charged with selling counterfeit immigration and social security documents. Following Carrasco’s arrest, he was brought to Kading’s office in the Dirksen federal building and orally given his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 435 [436] [86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694] (1966), in Spanish. Carrasco also signed a paper, in Spanish, that also stated his Miranda rights and his acknowledgement that he had received them. Carrasco then listened to a tape that apparently held incrimin…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw