HANSON ET AL.
v.
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY

U.S. | 1966-05-16
No. 1170
384 U.S. 211 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Gunther v. San Diego & A. E. R. Co., 382 U. S. 257.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Fletcher H. Hanson v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 412 F.2d 631 (4th Cir. 1969)
    …llowed. . After the G & O’s motion to dismiss was denied, Hanson v. Chesapeake & O. Ry., 198 F.Supp. 325 (S.D.W.Va.1961), judgment was entered for the C & O, 236 F.Supp. 56 (S.D.W.Va.1964), aff’d 351 F. 2d 953 (4th Cir. 1965); vacated and remanded, 384 U.S. 211, 86 S.Ct. 1464, 16 L.Ed.2d 481 (1966); reversed and remanded, 367 F. 2d 134 (4th Cir. 1966). . Act of June 20, 1966, Pub.L.No.89-456, § 2, 80 Stat. 208. The amendments apply to claims pending June 20, 1966. Transportation-Communication Employees Un…
  • Fletcher H. Hanson v. The Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 367 F.2d 134 (4th Cir. 1966)
    …Reversed and remanded. . Hanson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 236 F.Supp. 56 (1964). . Huntington, West Virginia. . Ashland, Kentucky. . 236 F.Supp. 56 at p. 57. . 351 F. 2d 953 (4 Cir., November 4, 1965). . Hanson v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co., 384 U.S. 211, 86 S.Ct. 1464, 16 L.Ed.2d 481 (1966).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw