DROBNICK ET AL.

v.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND BUILDINGS OF ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• Water Servs., Inc. v. Tesco Chems., Inc., 410 F.2d 163 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …4 Cir. 1964, 337 F. 2d 716, cert. denied, 1966, 383 U.S. 934, 86 S.Ct. 1061, 15 L.Ed.2d 851, reh. den. 1966, 384 U.S. 914, 86 S.Ct. 1333, 16 L.Ed. 366; Schulenberg v. Signatrol, Inc., 33 Ill.2d 379, 212 N.E. 2d 865, 868, [*172] (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 959, 86 S.Ct. 1225, 16 L.Ed.2d 302 (1966). Hampton v. Blair Mfg. Co., 8 Cir. 1967, 374 F. 2d 969, applied Sears, not to deny trade secret status, but to limit the duration of the injunction. A patent may be distinguished from a trade secret in that a p…
• Syntex Ophthalmics, Inc. v. Novicky, 745 F.2d 1423 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …f the confidential relationship, and (4) that Novicky profited from the disclosure.22 See Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc., 50 Ill.App.2d 402, 200 N.E. 2d 615 (1964), affd in part and rev'd in part, 33 Ill.2d 379, 212 N.E. 2d 865 (1965), cert, denied, 383 U.S. 959, 86 S.Ct. 1225, 16 L.Ed.2d 302 (1966). On the record before us, we cannot say that these findings were clearly erroneous. See Rosemount, Inc. v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., 727 F. 2d 1540, 1544 n. 4, 221 USPQ 1, 5 n. 4 (Fed.Cir.1984); Raytheon Co. v.…