PINCH
v.
MAXWELL, WARDEN
PINCH
MAXWELL, WARDEN
383 U.S. 938
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Ralph Maselli v. Reincke, 383 F.2d 129 (2d Cir. 1967)…ight reveals tactical or strategic errors “over which conscientious attorneys might differ”, United States v. Garguilo, 324 F. 2d 795, 797 (2 Cir. 1963); see, e. g., United States ex rel. Fazio v. Fay, 348 F. 2d 418, 420 (2 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 938, 86 S.Ct. 1069, 15 L.Ed.2d 854 (1966); Edwards v. United States, 265 F. 2d 909, 910 (6 Cir. 1959), for Piccolo could not seriously have hoped to further his client’s interests in the case in which he had been convicted and sentenced by negotiating w…
-
United States ex rel. Charles F. Scott v. Mancusi, 429 F.2d 104 (2d Cir. 1970)…tious attorneys might differ.’ ” United States ex rel. Maselli v. Reincke, 383 F. 2d 129, 132 (2d Cir. 1967). See United States v. Garguilo, 324 F. 2d 795 (2d Cir. 1963); United States ex rel. Fazio v. Fay, 348 F. 2d 418 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied 383 U.S. 938, 86 S.Ct. 1069, 15 L.Ed.2d 854 (1966); Edwards v. United States, 265 F. 2d 909 (6th Cir. 1959). This was advice that any ordinarily competent attorney should have been able to give without difficulty. All he had to do was to read the New York statut…