TIBBETTS

v.

KNOWLES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …of his statements at the time he made those statements is essential to a perjury conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1621. United States v. Stone, 429 F. 2d 138, 140 (2d Cir. 1970); LaPlaca v. United States, 354 F. 2d 56, 58 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 927, 86 S.Ct. 932, 15 L.Ed.2d 846 (1966); United States v. Magin, 280 F. 2d 74, 76 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 914, 81 S.Ct. 271, 5 L.Ed.2d 228 (1960). Sweig argues that this essential element of knowledge or wilfulness was not proven here. Fir…
• United States v. Kehoe, 562 F.2d 65 (1st Cir. 1977)
  …“present sense impression” recorded close to the time of the event and as such are not excluded under the hearsay rule. There was no error. See Fed.R.Evid. 803(1). See also La Placa v. United States, 354 F. 2d 56, 59 (1st Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 927, 86 S.Ct. 932, 15 L.Ed.2d 846 (1966). Affirmed. . The Indictment read as follows: “A. That on or about June 4, 1975, at Boston in the District of Massachusetts, ROBERT JOSEPH KEHOE, of Boston, in said District, in response to a subpoena duly is…
• United States v. Perez, 493 F.2d 1339 (10th Cir. 1974)
  …er who did not confront the defendants in court, and was not subject to cross-examination or under oath. It was inadmissible. Dennis v. United States, 302 F. 2d 5, 10 (10th Cir.); La Placa v. United States, 354 F. 2d 56, 59 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 927, 86 S.Ct. 932, 15 L.Ed.2d 846; see United States v. Brown, 411 F. 2d 1134, 1138 (10th Cir.). And since these basic rights were infringed, the Sixth Amendment guaranty of confrontation was denied. Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 295, 93 S.Ct.…