ROBINSON ET AL.

v.

HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Seale, 461 F.2d 345 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …vation, it would have been error for the trial court to force Kunstler’s services upon Seale over his insistence on defending himself. The Government relies on this Court’s opinion in United States v. Cozzi, 354 F. 2d 637 (1965), certiorari denied, 383 U.S. 911, 86 S.Ct. 896, 15 L.Ed.2d 666. When that cause was called for trial, John Cogan, attorney for Cozzi, explained that because of a prosecution subpoena served on Anthony Butera, Jr., whom he had also represented, there appeared to be a conflict of int…
• United States v. Burton, 584 F.2d 485 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  …6, 1379-80 (4th Cir. 1974); United States v. Brown, supra, 495 F. 2d at 600; United States v. Harrelson, supra, 477 F. 2d at 384; Giacalone v. Lucas, supra, 445 F. 2d at 1243; United States v. Cozzi, 354 F. 2d 637, 639 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 911, 86 S.Ct. 896, 15 L.Ed.2d 666 (1966). . A showing of prejudice to the defendant’s case is not a prerequisite to the granting of a continuance. See United States v. Johnston, 318 F. 2d 288 (6th Cir. 1963). However, if some prejudice is identifiable,…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Parker v. Estelle, 498 F.2d 625 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …ntinuance is fully supported by the record, see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) ; United States v. Carter, 453 F. 2d 402 (6th Cir. 1971); Bowman v. United States, 409 F. 2d 225 (5th Cir. 1969), and United States v. Cozzi, 354 F. 2d 637 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 911, 86 S.Ct. 896, 15 L.Ed.2d 666 (1965). . We avoid any determination of whether the prosecutor’s and trial judge’s knowledge of the possibility of an insanity defense was sufficient state action to bind the State of Texas to the actions of retained c…