CALIFORNIA

v.

STEWART; MIRANDA V. ARIZONA; VIGNERA V. NEW YORK; WESTOVER V. UNITED STATES; JOHNSON ET AL. V. NEW JERSEY

Citator

Cited By

• Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (U.S. 1966)
  …in obtaining an acquittal on retrial, however, under California law the State would have no appeal. Satisfied that in these circumstances the decision below constituted a final judgment under 28 U. S. C. § 1257 (3) (1964 ed.), we denied the motion. 383 U. S. 903.…
• Mills v. Alabama, 384 U.S. 214 (U.S. 1966)
  …fair warning that the publication of an editorial of this kind was reached by the foregoing provisions of the Alabama Corrupt Practices Act. See Winters v. New York, 333 U. S. 507. I deem a broader holding unnecessary. * In California v. Stewart, 383 U. S. 903, where a state court reversed a criminal conviction on federal grounds, we ruled on a motion to dismiss that the State may obtain review in this Court even though a new trial remained to be held. We reached that conclusion because otherwise the Stat…
• United States v. Alessi, 544 F.2d 1139 (2d Cir. 1976)
  …ul in obtaining an acquittal on retrial, however, under California law the State would have no appeal.5 Satisfied that in these circumstances the decision below constituted a final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1257(3) (1964 ed.), we denied the motion. 383 U.S. 903 [86 S.Ct. 885,15 L.Ed.2d 661]. [*1148] In Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 95 S.Ct. 1029, 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975), Mr. Justice White endeavored to rationalize where these decisions and similar ones in civil cases had left the final judgme…