DIETZ

v.

CITY OF TOLEDO

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Eder Instrument Co., Inc. v. Allen, 253 So. 2d 902 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
  …cuniary benefit of the person providing or otherwise dealing with those goods, DeVaney v. Rumsch, Fla.1969, 228 So. 2d 904, under the “doing business” long-arm statute, § 48.181. Cf. Stephenson v. Duriron Co., 401 P. 2d 423 (Alaska, 1965) cert. den. 382 U.S. 956, 86 S.Ct. 431, 15 L.Ed.2d 360. We must again admit to a strong feeling that public policy influences us to a holding that a supplier of a medical instrument which has such intimate internal physical contact as is the instrument here ought to be amen…
• Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 (U.S. 1974)
  …at 487-488; Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day, 370 U. S., at 482-487 (opinion of Harlan, J.); United States v. Thevis, 484 F. 2d 1149, 1152 (CA5 1973), cert. pending, No. 73-1075; United States v. Luros, 243 F. Supp. 160, 167 (ND Iowa), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 956 (1965). The legal definition of obscenity does not" change with each indictment; it is a term sufficiently definite in legal meaning to give a defendant notice of the charge against him. Roth v. United States, supra, [*119] at 491-492; Manual Enterp…
• G. M. Leasing Corp. v. United States, 429 U.S. 338 (U.S. 1977)
  …be considered if and when proceedings arise in which the Government seeks to use the documents or information obtained from them. See Meister v. United States, 397 F. 2d 268, 269 (CA3 1968); Hill v. United States, 346 F. 2d 175 (CA9), cert. denied, 382 U. S. 956 (1965). And the irreparable injury required to support a motion to suppress, under Fed. Rule Crim. Proc. 41 (e), on equitable grounds in advance of any proceedings, has not been demonstrated [*360]. Hunsucker v. Phinney, 497 F. 2d 29, 34 (CA5 1974),…