SIBLEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Lacaze v. United States, 391 F.2d 516 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …ediction the defendants urge that the sentences imposed upon them are severe and excessive. Ordinarily a sentence within the limits of a statute is not within our appellate ambit. Sibley v. United States, 5 Cir. 1965, 344 F. 2d 103, 105, cert. den., 382 U.S. 945, 86 S.Ct. 405, 15 L.Ed.2d 354; White v. United States, 5 Cir. 1964, 330 F. 2d 993, 995; Sullivan v. United States, 5 Cir. 1963, 317 F. 2d 101, 102; Bell v. United States, 5 Cir. 1938, 100 F. 2d 474, 477. See also Fed.R.Crim.P. 35. Exceptional circum…
• United States ex rel. Clay Thomas v. State OF NEW Jersey, 472 F.2d 735 (3d Cir. 1973)
  …meaning of Supreme Court Rule 49(3). The leading case is O’Brien v. Lindsey, 202 F. 2d 418 (1st Cir. 1953). Accord Lewis v. Henderson, 356 F. 2d 105 (6th Cir. 1966); United States ex rel. Calhoun v. Pate, 341 F. 2d 885 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 945, 86 S.Ct. 402, 15 L.Ed.2d 354 (1965); Painten v. Massachusetts, 254 F.Supp. 246 (D.Mass), aff’d, 368 F. 2d 142 (1st Cir. 1966), cert. granted, 386 U.S. 931, 87 S.Ct. 955, 17 L.Ed.2d 805 (1967), cert. dismissed, 389 U.S. 560, 88 S.Ct. 660, 19 L.Ed.2d…